Reading 3 of 7 free1776 Club · all 7 storiesMonday, August 17
From the desk
Start with 1943 over Germany: 376 B-17s split into two forces, one bound for the Messerschmitt works at Regensburg and on to North Africa, the other for Schweinfurt's ball-bearing plants, both flying past where their fighter escorts could follow. Sixty bombers went down, the worst single-mission loss the Eighth Air Force had yet taken. Also worth your time: Patton walking into Messina hours ahead of Montgomery on the same date, closing Sicily's last escape route. Fort Sumter's ruins took another pounding too, proof a fort could stop functioning long before it stopped drawing fire.
— The Patriot Compass desk
1943Featured · This day in history
376 bombers split into two forces; 60 do not come home
By the summer of 1943, the Eighth Air Force had quadrupled its bomber fleet and was hunting German fighter production ahead of any invasion of Europe. On August 17, 146 B-17s under Colonel Curtis LeMay struck the Messerschmitt works at Regensburg and pressed on to North Africa, while 230 more under Brigadier General Robert Williams hit the ball-bearing plants at Schweinfurt and turned back for England. Fighter escorts could only reach as far as Eupen, Belgium, and German fighters found the bombers minutes later. Sixty B-17s went down, the worst single-mission loss the force had yet suffered.
This mission exposed the cost of daylight precision bombing without long-range fighter escort. The five-month suspension of deep raids that followed pushed American war planners toward the drop-tank fighters that would escort bombers all the way to Berlin by 1944, a doctrine shift that shaped how the Army Air Forces fought the rest of the war.
Did you know
QHow many bombers came home too damaged to ever fly again?
Beyond the 60 B-17s lost outright, mission records show another 55 to 95 aircraft returned to England so shot up they were written off as beyond economical repair. That range reflects how hard it was to count the wreckage, with damage teams sorting through airframes hit by cannon fire and burned-out engines. Combined with the 60 outright losses, as many as 155 of the 376 attacking bombers were lost or wrecked in a single day. The scale of wrecked airframes sitting on English runways became its own argument inside the Eighth Air Force for rethinking how deep raids were flown without full fighter cover.
The Daily Record · free by email
Tomorrow's edition in your inbox — one story, one quote, the flag.
1863military
Fort Sumter takes another day of shelling; the fort answers with rubble, not guns
By mid-August 1863, Fort Sumter had become a pile of brick and sand rather than a functioning fort, and Union commanders meant to keep it that way. On August 17, Rear Admiral John A. Dahlgren's ironclads and Major General Quincy A. Gillmore's land batteries on Morris Island opened a coordinated bombardment on the Confederate-held fort in Charleston Harbor. Major Thomas A. Huguenin's garrison had no working heavy guns left to answer with. The shelling battered the fort further but did not force its surrender.
Fort Sumter, Charleston Harbor, South CarolinaStory page →
Charleston Harbor was where American soldiers first fired on each other in 1861, and by 1863 the Union treated its recapture as a matter of national symbolism as much as strategy. The siege previewed a style of total-war pressure on Southern ports that Union commanders applied from Mobile to Wilmington through the war's final two years.
Did you know
QHow did Confederate gunners at Sumter end up firing salvaged Union weapons?
When the Union ironclad Keokuk sank off Charleston in April 1863 after taking dozens of hits during Du Pont's failed assault, Confederate salvage crews went out and pulled her guns from the wreck. Those recovered cannon were hauled into Fort Sumter and mounted to help bolster its defenses. The episode meant the fort was, in part, armed with Union ordnance turned back against the ships that fired it. This reflected a practical shortage at Sumter: rather than new guns, the garrison relied on scavenging what the harbor had claimed. Salvaging enemy wreckage became a routine part of Charleston's defense for the rest of the siege.
QWhat made Rear Admiral Dahlgren so confident Sumter would fall easily to a landing party?
Dahlgren badly misjudged the garrison's strength, declaring at one point, "There is nothing but a corporal's guard in the fort, and all we have to do is go and take possession." That confidence fed into planning for a naval boat assault meant to seize the ruins outright rather than simply shell them. Commander Thomas H. Stevens, Jr., who was expected to help lead such an operation, later complained about how little he was told, saying, "I knew nothing of its organization... I made some remonstrances on this ground and others." The mismatch between Dahlgren's optimism and the actual planning chaos matched the poor army-navy coordination that plagued the wider siege.
QWhy could Fort Sumter still hurt Union ships even after its guns were mostly wrecked?
The fort's barbette tier, an elevated open gun platform running along the top of the walls, survived well enough that Confederate gunners could still fire down onto Union vessels approaching in the harbor. Firing from height gave defenders a steep angle of plunging fire that was harder for ironclads to shrug off than a level broadside, even with most of Sumter's heavy artillery disabled or removed elsewhere in the fort. That single surviving firing position let a garrison with almost no working armament still complicate Union naval movement in the channel. It was a small tactical edge carved out of an otherwise gutted fortress.
1998government
Clinton tells grand jury of "improper" ties to Lewinsky, then tells the country he misled them
Seven months after Bill Clinton looked into a camera and denied any relationship with Monica Lewinsky, he sat for taped grand jury testimony on August 17, 1998, and admitted to an "improper physical relationship" with the former White House intern. That evening he went further, telling the nation in a televised address that he had "misled people, and I'm sorry." The dual admission, testimony first, confession second, came after DNA evidence and immunized testimony from Lewinsky had left him little room to maneuver.
A sitting president's grand jury testimony had never before been broadcast to the country he led, and the spectacle changed how Americans talked about presidential accountability and personal conduct in office. The day set up December's impeachment vote, only the second in the nation's history, and left "what the meaning of the word 'is' is" as a permanent shorthand for parsed political language.
Did you know
QWho first told Linda Tripp to hit record, and why?
Literary agent Lucianne Goldberg gave Tripp that advice. Tripp had been confiding in Goldberg about Monica Lewinsky's private disclosures, and Goldberg suggested secretly taping the conversations rather than simply relaying them. Tripp followed through, then delivered the recordings to Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr. The push to record came only after Lewinsky allegedly urged Tripp to commit perjury in the Paula Jones case, giving Tripp a motive to protect herself with hard evidence. What began as one coworker's advice to another turned a private friendship into the evidentiary backbone of a federal investigation, all before Starr's office ever opened a grand jury on the matter.
QWhat specific advice did Linda Tripp give Lewinsky about the blue dress before it became evidence?
Tripp told Lewinsky not to dry clean the dress, calling it an "insurance policy" on the relationship with Clinton. That instruction preserved the biological evidence that would later be tested by the FBI, which matched semen stains on the garment to a blood sample from Clinton. Tripp also encouraged Lewinsky to hold onto gifts Clinton had given her, building a paper-and-fabric trail long before Starr's investigators ever asked for one. The dress ended up providing the scientific proof that months of denials and depositions had not.
QHow old were Clinton and Lewinsky when their relationship began, and how long did it last?
Clinton was 49 and Lewinsky was 22 when the relationship began in 1995, and it continued for about 18 months before ending in 1997. That timeline meant the relationship had already been over for roughly a year by the time Clinton denied it on camera in January 1998. It also meant Starr's investigators were reconstructing events that predated the Paula Jones lawsuit's own filing, stitching together an affair that had run its course quietly before Tripp's tapes and Lewinsky's affidavit pulled it into public view.
